rambo said: red steel - arguably poor control, good graphics, multiplayer
far cry - good control, truly atrocious graphics
cod 3 - good control, bad graphics

i'm leaning toward cod 3, as it has generally garnered positive reviews. consensus on cod 3 is the controls are good, but the graphics can be a lot better. far cry has been decimated due to the atrocious graphics, but controls are also good. red steel looks great, but has often been accused of poor controls.

i wish ubisoft had the presence of mind to communicate between its teams i.e. why couldn't the far cry people help the red steel people out with the controls??

so wii hasn't really had an FPS with a good balance between good graphics and good control yet. which is a real shame, as it certainly has the potential for it. at the moment, the best middle ground is cod 3 - acceptable graphics, and good control.

iddqd said: But Knuckels, lol it's the other way round. You haven't played the 360 version. I've played 'em both. So don't say stuff that you don't know anything about, that's the number one sign that you're a mindless fanboy. Far Cry has been around on PC and Xbox a lot longer than it's been on Wii. How can you say it's **** on Xbox 360 when the Wii version is a dumbed down port?

knukles said:
hey wanka who said i havnt played it LOL???
funny how you make up crap! Your an ill informed fool ..The 360 version is just a spruced up (by 1%) xbox version mate..
Dont try and tell me what i have and dont have!
I have more than you could ever obtain your lifetime..
And many here on this forum have seen it! By the way i own everysingle game for the 360..
So watch your mouth.

iddqd said: And I surely haven't said anything that I can justify. Not once. What I say is based on opinion, not fact.